Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a global score of 79.6 against 77. Samsung Galaxy A30's construction is newer, just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The HTC U Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A30 both feature similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A30 has a larger number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a back camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
HTC U Ultra features a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A30 counts with improved battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.