Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, having a general score of 81.3 against 77. Galaxy A31's design is way newer, but a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than HTC U Ultra. Galaxy A31 has a bit better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A31 also has more cpu cores.
HTC U Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A31 has a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have equal internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A31 counts with a much better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.