Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is slightly better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's construction is much newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores. HTC U Ultra features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures much better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.