Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is noticeably newer, just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the HTC U Ultra. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit better CPU than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 4 more cpu cores.
HTC U Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixels quantity per inch in the display. HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality pictures, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A50 features longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.