Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. Samsung Galaxy A50s's body is incredibly newer, a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater number of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A50s has a bit superior processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). The HTC U Ultra features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A50s counts with improved battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.