Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the HTC U Ultra, getting an 85.5 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy A51's design has the same thickness than HTC U Ultra, but it's just a bit heavier. The Galaxy A51 features a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A51 also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A51 captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger sensor taking better quality photos.
HTC U Ultra features slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A51, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A51 counts with better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.