Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G design is noticeably newer than HTC U Ultra's, although it's just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
The HTC U Ultra has a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a slightly better storage for apps and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.