Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than HTC U Ultra, with a 90.7 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A52 body is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 has just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster). Galaxy A52 has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also has a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.