Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than HTC U Ultra, with a 91.3 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body is newer, but heavier and a little bit thicker than the HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera in the back with much more MP and a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.