Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than the Galaxy A70, with a 77 score against 76.9. The HTC U Ultra is a a bit lighter phone than Galaxy A70, but they are 0.31inches thick. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A70 has a bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores.
The Galaxy A70 features a superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity. HTC U Ultra features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A70, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.