Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the HTC U Ultra, with a global score of 92.9 against 77. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a incredibly newer phone than the HTC U Ultra, although it's a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much better resolution camera and a much larger camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy A71 5G UW is also cheaper than the HTC U Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.