Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, although it is way heavier and thicker. HTC U Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better storage to install games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy F62 features a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.