Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. The Galaxy Fold design is much newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC U Ultra's, but it is also notably heavier. The Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra has just a bit better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher display pixel density. Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Fold has just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Fold also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than the HTC U Ultra, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.