Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra, with a general score of 78.9 against 77. Galaxy M20's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and a little heavier than the HTC U Ultra. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in HTC U Ultra, and although the Samsung Galaxy M20 has more cpu cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
HTC U Ultra features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. HTC U Ultra takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a less MP camera, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M20, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M20 has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.