Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is slightly better than HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy M30 body is a lot newer, but a bit heavier and a bit thicker than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater display density.
HTC U Ultra counts with slightly more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M30 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy M30 features a much longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity. The HTC U Ultra takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photos, a much better (4K) video quality and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.