Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is better than HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. Galaxy M51 is a newer device than HTC U Ultra, but it is way heavier and thicker. HTC U Ultra has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Galaxy M51 features a bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. HTC U Ultra has just a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures.
The Galaxy M51 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 133% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.