Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than the HTC U Ultra, having a 90.8 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body is notably newer than the HTC U Ultra's, but it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. HTC U Ultra counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs more than HTC U Ultra, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.