Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than HTC U Ultra, having a 98.9 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than HTC U Ultra. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little lower pixel count per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a larger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution, a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.