Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra, getting an 81.2 score against 77. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is just a little bit lighter than HTC U Ultra, but it's just a bit thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better display than HTC U Ultra, although it has a way lower quantity of pixels per screen inch and a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra GPU. The HTC U Ultra shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a lower video quality and a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3200mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.