Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, with a global score of 77.6 against 77. Although it's the best we are comparing here, we must highlight that it's also way older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy Note4 has a little bit better looking screen than HTC U Ultra. Both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560, the same screen pixels density and a same size display.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a bit longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3220mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note4 has a camera that is just as good as the camera in HTC U Ultra, because although the Galaxy Note4 has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and a smaller camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.