Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. Galaxy Note7 is a a bit lighter cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, but both of them are equally thin. The Galaxy Note7's processing unit is just as good as the HTC U Ultra one, both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Quad-Core CPU.
Galaxy Note7 has a display that's just as good as the screen in HTC U Ultra, both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, a better pixels count per inch of screen and a screen with the same size. HTC U Ultra has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 17% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.