Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than HTC U Ultra, getting a overall score of 88.3 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a just a bit lighter device than the HTC U Ultra, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a quite greater pixels density, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a little bigger display.
The HTC U Ultra features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 features a little faster processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S10 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10 also counts with higher video frame rates and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Galaxy S10 has just a little bit longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.