Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 score. Galaxy S10 Lite's design is extremely newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it is a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and better video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.