Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a score of 86.3 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body has the same thickness than HTC U Ultra, but it is lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit superior CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra features a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little better display pixels density. HTC U Ultra has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S10e, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10e also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and higher video frame rates.
Galaxy S10e has a bit better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10e is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.