Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than HTC U Ultra, with a 90.8 score against 77. Galaxy S20 FE is a notably newer device than HTC U Ultra, although it's just a bit thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S20 FE is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.