Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.00 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is thinner and lighter than HTC U Ultra. Galaxy S25 has a much better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The HTC U Ultra features a lot better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster). Samsung Galaxy S25 has a way better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much better video quality.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S25 features superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S25 is a bit more expensive than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.