Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.00 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than HTC U Ultra, with a score of 90.7 against 77. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is way lighter and incredibly thinner than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra features a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a larger display. HTC U Ultra has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes greater pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a camera with a much higher 200 MP resolution, a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations, a way higher video resolution and a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.