Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a score of 81 against 77. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a lot newer than HTC U Ultra, it is extremely heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger number of faster cores.
The HTC U Ultra has a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. HTC U Ultra has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.