Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than HTC U Ultra, having a score of 88.5 against 77. Galaxy Z Flip's body is a lot newer and just a bit thinner than HTC U Ultra's, although it's also a little heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The HTC U Ultra has just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a little bit better screen density. Galaxy Z Flip takes clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The HTC U Ultra has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than HTC U Ultra, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.