Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than HTC U Ultra, getting a score of 85.6 against 77. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is noticeably newer and thinner than HTC U Ultra's, although it's also just a little bit heavier. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher number of pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The HTC U Ultra features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a 12 megapixels back facing camera and the same camera aperture. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs more than HTC U Ultra, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.