Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than HTC U Ultra, having a 92.3 score against 77. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit heavier than the HTC U Ultra, it's a bit thinner and newer. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a greater hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
The HTC U Ultra has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a bit higher pixel number in each inch of display. The HTC U Ultra features more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video definition, a same size aperture and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.