Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is way newer and somewhat thinner than HTC U Ultra's, although it is also noticeably heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2560px resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity in each inch of display. HTC U Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the HTC U Ultra also has a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.