Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 global score. The HTC U Ultra body is thinner and somewhat lighter than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it was released many years before. The TCL 20 Pro 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra features just a bit better looking screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher display density. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures.
TCL 20 Pro 5G features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.