Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than HTC U Ultra, having a global score of 90.1 against 77. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a notably newer device than the HTC U Ultra, but it is notably thicker and incredibly heavier. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a larger display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a way better resolution back facing camera, faster 60 fps video frame rates and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
The HTC U Ultra has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.