Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is much better than the HTC U Ultra, getting an 88.3 score against 77. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a a lot newer device than HTC U Ultra, although it is heavier and extremely thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a greater processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a little more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite worse pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger display. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a very superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a way more MP back facing camera and a larger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The HTC U Ultra features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a really longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.