Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a general score of 81.4, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a much newer phone, and it's also a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the HTC U Ultra. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite worse pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The HTC U Ultra has a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE captures much clearer videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a larger sensor taking better quality photos and videos and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.