Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| 2017-02-21 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max has a score of 77.5, which is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra's score of 77. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Mi Max is older and heavier than the HTC U Ultra, it's body is still just a little thinner. HTC U Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels density.
HTC U Ultra has a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Max and HTC U Ultra have incredibly similar processors, and although the Xiaomi Mi Max has 4 more cores (but slower), they both have 4 GB of RAM.
The HTC U Ultra takes clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a much less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better captures in low light environments. Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a way better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.