Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| 2017-02-21 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having an 83.8 score against 77. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a newer phone than HTC U Ultra, but it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
HTC U Ultra has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit superior CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The HTC U Ultra takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same resolution back facing camera, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the HTC U Ultra also has a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has just a bit longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.