Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| 2017-02-21 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, with an 83.8 score against 77. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 construction is newer, but incredibly heavier and just a little thicker than the HTC U Ultra. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit worse pixels amount per screen inch and a little worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The HTC U Ultra has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a back-facing camera with more MP and better video frame rate. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.