Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 construction is notably newer and thinner than HTC U Ultra's, but it is also noticeably heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a brighter screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels and a much larger display.
HTC U Ultra counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The HTC U Ultra features a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and less RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures way better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a camera with a much better resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a much larger camera sensor. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.