Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a bit better than HTC U Ultra, getting an 83.7 score against 77. Although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is notably newer than HTC U Ultra, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a bit superior CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Xiaomi Mi Note 10 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 75% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.