Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a score of 80.6, which is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's design is noticeably newer than HTC U Ultra's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has just a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little lower display pixel density and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little larger display. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
HTC U Ultra has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.