Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than HTC U Ultra, having an 87.9 score against 77. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is extremely newer than HTC U Ultra, it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
HTC U Ultra features much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.