Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra, with a 78.7 score against 77. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a notably newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier. HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel count in each inch in the screen.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.