Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a score of 81.6 against 77. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a notably newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, although it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM.
HTC U Ultra features just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. HTC U Ultra counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures greater pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 72 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.