Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a bit better than HTC U Ultra, having a 78.3 score against 77. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a newer device than HTC U Ultra, but it is a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a larger number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a bit sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a camera that is just as good as HTC U Ultra's camera, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a much better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
The HTC U Ultra has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a much better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.