Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a general score of 82.4, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's body is incredibly newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the HTC U Ultra. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little bit better screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little worse pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a very superior camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
HTC U Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.