Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than the HTC U Ultra, with a score of 86.1 against 77. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro body is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than HTC U Ultra. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro feature extremely similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a just a little worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a way better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
HTC U Ultra has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.