Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a score of 77.1, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 2080 x 2400. The HTC U Ultra features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.