Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is better than the HTC U Ultra, with a 91.5 score against 77. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer design is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than HTC U Ultra. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a slightly better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a bit better processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer takes way better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
HTC U Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a much better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.